The purpose of this study was to assess the ways in which a sample group of companies discuss information and knowledge.\ud\udQuantitative and qualitative content analyses were used to survey the way that companies present and value information and knowledge, based on the annual reports of the FTSE 100, the United Kingdom's largest publicly-listed companies. A novel content analysis approach is used, based on a set of categories proposed by Oppenheim, Stenson and Wilson.\ud\udMany of the companies analysed made explicit the importance of information and knowledge, through either discussion in the text of the annual report or through an attempt to assign a monetary value to information assets. Where the importance of information and knowledge was not made explicit, the study revealed links between successful performance and effective use of information assets. Different categories of information assets were identified within the annual reports.\ud\udConclusions drawn from the analysis include that information and knowledge are demonstrably important to FTSE 100 companies, although the specific term “knowledge” does not appear to have a special significance in the companies’ lexicon; and that certain sectors, such as General Financial, General Retail, Travel & Leisure, Mining, Aerospace & Defence and Software & Computer Services, mention information and knowledge more than others.
展开▼
机译:这项研究的目的是评估样本公司讨论信息和知识的方式。\ ud \ ud基于年度报告的定量和定性内容分析用于调查公司呈现和重视信息和知识的方式英国最大的上市公司FTSE 100中的一员。基于Oppenheim,Stenson和Wilson提出的一组类别,使用了一种新颖的内容分析方法。\ ud \ ud分析的许多公司通过在年度报告正文中进行讨论或在年度报告正文中进行讨论来明确了信息和知识的重要性。通过尝试将货币值分配给信息资产。在没有明确信息和知识重要性的情况下,该研究揭示了成功绩效与信息资产有效使用之间的联系。在年度报告中确定了不同类别的信息资产。\ ud \ ud分析得出的结论包括,信息和知识对FTSE 100公司具有明显的重要性,尽管特定术语“知识”似乎在FTSE 100公司中没有特殊意义。公司的词典;某些领域,例如一般金融,一般零售,旅行与休闲,采矿,航空航天与国防以及软件和计算机服务,比其他领域更重视信息和知识。
展开▼